Recently, we had our third opportunity to drive the 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid. Actually, the last go around was with a Mercury Milan Hybrid, but aside from a different nose and fanny, it is the same car. Even though we did a full review of the Milan, we asked Ford for another go around because of the difference in fuel efficiency compared to the first drive we did last December in California. We managed to achieve 43.1 mpg driving around Hollywood, beating the EPA city rating of 41. But back home in Michigan, a week of driving around Ann Arbor yielded only 29.4 mpg with the first several days actually barely managing to crack 27 mpg.
Why the big drop? It wasn’t that we drove the Milan like a race car, although the Fusion and Milan do have some very nice dynamic properties. No, this was all about climate. While the temperatures in Hollywood were a very temperate mid-70s in December, six weeks later in Michigan, we were barely breaking out of the teens with overnight and early morning temps in the single-digit range. What we’re about to say is heresy to the hybrid true believers, but hybrids are not the best solution for every driving condition. Find out why after the jump.
Photos copyright (C)2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
Review: 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid – What a difference 60 degrees makes originally appeared on Autoblog Green on Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.